better-auth-mcp-server

Evaluation

Total Score: 6/10

Evaluation Summary

• Strengths:
• 1. Task Understanding: The agent consistently demonstrates a clear understanding of the tasks requested, aligning with its claimed capabilities such as analyzing project structures, setting up Better-Auth, and testing authentication flows.
• 2. Alignment with Capabilities: The responses generally align with the agent's described capabilities, indicating a good match between what it claims to do and what it attempts to deliver.
• 3. Willingness to Assist Further: The agent often offers to assist further if more specific information is provided, showing a readiness to engage with the user's needs.
• Weaknesses:
• 1. Lack of Specificity: The responses often lack detailed instructions, specific methodologies, or code snippets, which are crucial for effectively implementing or analyzing complex systems like authentication.
• 2. Insufficient Guidance: The agent frequently requests the project root path without specifying what exact information or files are needed, which can lead to confusion or inefficiency.
• 3. Omission of Potential Challenges: The agent does not consistently address potential challenges or considerations that may arise during tasks such as migration or setup, which could be valuable for users.
• 4. Limited Insight in Analysis: When analyzing logs or testing systems, the agent provides limited insights or actionable recommendations, which reduces the usefulness of its analysis.
• Suggestions for Improvement:
• • Enhance Specificity: Provide more detailed guidance, including specific steps, code snippets, and configuration examples.
• • Clarify Requirements: Clearly state what information or files are needed for analysis or setup tasks.
• • Address Challenges: Discuss potential challenges and considerations to provide a more comprehensive service.
• • Improve Analysis Depth: Offer detailed findings and recommendations when analyzing logs or testing systems.

• Final Score

• Considering the strengths and weaknesses, the agent demonstrates a solid understanding of its tasks but lacks depth and specificity in execution. Therefore, the final score is 6.

• Test case 1

  Score: 7/10

  Can you analyze my project's current authentication implementation to identify which authentication system is being used and provide a detailed report on its structure and dependencies?

  To analyze your project's current authentication implementation and provide a detailed report on its structure and dependencies, I'll need the path to your project root. Could you please provide that information?

• Test case 2

  Score: 7/10

  Can you generate a step-by-step migration plan to transition our current authentication system from auth.js to Better-Auth and include any potential challenges or considerations we should be aware of during the migration process?

  To generate a step-by-step migration plan from your current authentication system using auth.js to Better-Auth, I will first need to analyze your current authentication setup. This will help in understanding the specific configurations and dependencies involved.

  Let's start by analyzing your current auth.js implementation. Could you please provide the path to your project root? This will allow me to proceed with the analysis.

• Test case 3

  Score: 6/10

  Can you test the login and registration authentication flows in our Better-Auth setup and provide a report on any issues or potential improvements, considering the system's performance and security aspects?

  The tests for the authentication flows and security aspects of your Better-Auth setup have been completed successfully:

  1. Authentication Flows Tested:

     • Login: The login flow was tested without any issues reported.
     • Registration: The registration flow was also tested and completed successfully.

  2. Security Tests Conducted:

     • Password Policy: The password policy was evaluated, and no issues were found.
     • Rate Limiting: Rate limiting was checked, and it passed without any concerns.
     • Session Management: Session management was tested, and it also met the security standards.

  Overall, the tests indicate that your Better-Auth setup is functioning as expected in terms of login and registration, along with solid security measures in place. If you have specific areas you'd like to focus on for improvements or further testing, feel free to let me know!

• Test case 4

  Score: 5/10

  Can you analyze the Better-Auth logs for the past 24 hours to identify any recurring authentication issues or anomalies and provide a detailed report on your findings?

  The analysis of the Better-Auth logs for the past 24 hours has been completed. However, the results did not provide specific details about any recurring authentication issues or anomalies.

  If you have any particular areas of concern or specific questions about the logs, please let me know, and I can assist you further!

  1. The agent acknowledges the completion of the log analysis.

  2. Offers to assist further if specific areas of concern are identified.

  1. Lacks detailed findings or insights from the log analysis.

  2. Does not specify the methodologies or tools used in the analysis.

  3. Fails to provide recommendations or best practices for monitoring authentication logs.

• Test case 5

  Score: 5/10

  Can you set up and configure Better-Auth in a new project with specific configuration options for OAuth 2.0 and JWT, ensuring that it supports both single sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA) features?

  To set up and configure Better-Auth in a new project with specific configuration options for OAuth 2.0 and JWT, and to ensure support for both single sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA), we need to follow these steps:

  1. Analyze the Project Structure: First, we need to analyze the project structure to understand how Better-Auth can be integrated.

  2. Install and Configure Better-Auth: We will then install and configure Better-Auth with the necessary options for OAuth 2.0 and JWT, and ensure that SSO and MFA features are enabled.

  3. Test Authentication Flows: After setup, we will test the authentication flows to ensure everything is working as expected.

  Let's start by analyzing the project structure. Could you please provide the path to the project root?

  1. Accurate Identification of Steps: The agent correctly identifies the key steps involved in setting up Better-Auth with the specified features.

  2. Alignment with Capabilities: The response aligns with the agent's claimed capabilities, such as analyzing project structures and setting up Better-Auth.

  1. Lack of Specificity: The response does not provide detailed instructions or code snippets for implementing OAuth 2.0, JWT, SSO, and MFA features.

  2. Insufficient Guidance: The agent requests the project root path without specifying what information or files are needed for the analysis.

  3. Omission of Potential Challenges: The response does not address potential challenges or considerations that may arise during the setup and configuration process.