cjo4m06/mcp-shrimp-task-manager
mcp-shrimp-task-manager is hosted online, so all tools can be tested directly either in theInspector tabor in theOnline Client.
If you are the rightful owner of mcp-shrimp-task-manager and would like to certify it and/or have it hosted online, please leave a comment on the right or send an email to henry@mcphub.com.
MCP Shrimp Task Manager is an intelligent task management system based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), designed to enhance programming workflows for AI Agents.
Try mcp-shrimp-task-manager with chat:
Has a README
Github repo has a README.md.
Has a License
Github repo has license info.
Server can be inspected
View server inspector
Server schema can be extracted
Can get at lease one tool info from the README or server.
Online hosted on MCPHub
Can be automatically deployed by MCPHub.
Has social accounts
Do not have any social accounts.
Claimed by the author or certified by MCPHub
If you are the author, claim authorship
AI Evaluation ReportTotal Score: 9/10
The agent demonstrates a strong ability to perform various tasks within the MCP Shrimp Task Manager, including initializing project standards, entering research mode for in-depth investigations, and effectively splitting complex tasks into manageable subtasks. The responses are consistently clear, structured, and aligned with the agent's claimed capabilities. The agent shows proficiency in task decomposition, research methodology, and project standards initialization, providing comprehensive and actionable outputs. However, there was a minor inconsistency noted in one of the research tasks, which slightly affected the overall evaluation. Despite this, the agent's performance is robust and reliable, showcasing its strengths in task management and research execution.
Test case 1
Score: 9/10Perform the operation of initializing project standards using the MCP Shrimp Task Manager to establish consistent coding patterns and practices.The project standards have been initialized successfully. A document titled
shrimp-rules.mdwill be created, focusing on the specific rules and limitations necessary for AI Agents to execute tasks. The document will include guidelines on project-specific information, code standards, functionality implementation standards, key file interactions, and prohibited actions. It will be structured in a way that allows for easy parsing by AI, avoiding general development knowledge and focusing only on project-specific rules. Next, the AI will proceed to develop the contents of theshrimp-rules.mdfile based on the provided guidelines.Test case 2
Score: 9/10Perform the operation of entering Research Mode in the MCP Shrimp Task Manager to systematically investigate and compare the performance and integration complexities of using Meilisearch versus Elasticsearch for enhancing search capabilities in a Laravel application.The research mode has been successfully initiated to investigate the performance and integration complexities of using Meilisearch versus Elasticsearch in a Laravel application. The research guidelines emphasize a deep and broad exploration of both technologies, focusing on key aspects such as:
- Performance Metrics: Gathering data on speed, accuracy, and efficiency in search operations.
- Integration Steps: Understanding the requirements and processes for integrating each search engine within a Laravel application.
- Complexities: Evaluating the challenges and considerations involved in using Meilisearch and Elasticsearch, including setup, configuration, and maintenance. The next steps will involve performing detailed searches using web tools to collect the latest information, analyzing the findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report on the topic. The research will ensure that all information is accurate, practical, and timely.
Test case 3
Score: 9/10Perform the operation of splitting the task 'Implement user authentication system' into independent subtasks using the MCP Shrimp Task Manager, establishing dependencies and prioritizing them.Here is the response to the input task:
Task Splitting - append Mode
Splitting Strategy
- Functional Decomposition - Independent testable sub-functions with clear inputs and outputs.
- Technical Layer Decomposition - Separate tasks along architectural layers, ensuring clear interfaces.
- Development Stage Decomposition - Core functionality first, optimization features later.
- Risk-based Decomposition - Isolate high-risk parts to reduce overall risk.
Task Quality Review
- Task Atomicity - Each task is small and specific enough to be completed independently.
- Dependencies - Task dependencies form a directed acyclic graph, avoiding circular dependencies.
- Description Completeness - Each task description is clear and accurate, including necessary context.
Task List
Task 1: Design Authentication Database Schema
- ID:
8e24eb6f-b445-4864-82c5-28fbb4a84237 - Description: Create a database schema to store user credentials and authentication tokens.
- Implementation Guide: Define tables for users and tokens, including fields for username, password hash, and token expiration.
- Verification Criteria: Database schema should support secure storage and retrieval of user credentials and tokens.
Task 2: Implement User Registration
- ID:
e301880a-c4b0-490b-b1fe-253488c31076 - Description: Develop functionality for new users to register an account.
- Implementation Guide: Create a registration form, validate input, hash passwords, and store user data in the database.
- Verification Criteria: Users should be able to register with a unique username and password.
- Dependencies: "Design Authentication Database Schema" (
8e24eb6f-b445-4864-82c5-28fbb4a84237)
Task 3: Implement User Login
- ID:
406803de-96db-4a42-84c5-8651d9b695c9 - Description: Develop functionality for users to log in to their account.
- Implementation Guide: Create a login form, validate credentials, and generate authentication tokens.
- Verification Criteria: Users should be able to log in with valid credentials and receive a token.
- Dependencies: "Design Authentication Database Schema" (
8e24eb6f-b445-4864-82c5-28fbb4a84237)
Task 4: Implement Token-Based Authentication
- ID:
42dd2c64-fcd5-46a7-8201-58cab6c7b76f - Description: Develop a system to authenticate users using tokens.
- Implementation Guide: Validate tokens on each request and manage token lifecycle.
- Verification Criteria: System should authenticate users based on valid tokens.
- Dependencies: "Implement User Login" (
406803de-96db-4a42-84c5-8651d9b695c9)
Task 5: Implement Password Reset
- ID:
e29af117-62d8-43c0-96e0-7ce4a45ed845 - Description: Develop functionality for users to reset their password.
- Implementation Guide: Create a password reset form, validate input, and update user credentials in the database.
- Verification Criteria: Users should be able to reset their password securely.
- Dependencies: "Design Authentication Database Schema" (
8e24eb6f-b445-4864-82c5-28fbb4a84237)
Dependency Management
- Dependencies can be set using task names or task IDs.
- Minimize the number of dependencies, setting only direct prerequisite tasks.
- Avoid circular dependencies, ensuring the task graph is directed and acyclic.
- Balance the critical path and optimize possibilities for parallel execution. This task splitting has resulted in a clear and actionable set of subtasks for implementing the user authentication system.
Test case 4
Score: 8/10Perform the operation of entering Research Mode in the MCP Shrimp Task Manager to systematically investigate and compare the performance and integration complexities of using Redis versus Memcached for caching in a Django application.The tool has successfully entered Research Mode to investigate and compare Redis and Memcached for caching in a Django application. The research will focus on performance metrics, integration complexities, and best practices for using these caching systems. The research will be documented in a structured manner, and progress will be continually logged to ensure thorough exploration of the topic.
Test case 5
Score: 9/10Perform the operation of entering Research Mode in the MCP Shrimp Task Manager to systematically investigate and compare the performance and integration complexities of using RabbitMQ versus Apache Kafka for implementing a message queue system in a Node.js application.You have successfully entered Research Mode to investigate and compare RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka for implementing a message queue system in a Node.js application. The research outlines the guidelines and strategies for a comprehensive exploration of both technologies, focusing on aspects such as performance metrics, integration complexities, and best practices.
Key Research Guidelines:
- Depth and Breadth Requirements: Thoroughly explore concepts, techniques, and solutions, while also investigating alternatives and related tools.
- Search Strategy: Utilize concise and precise keywords for effective searches, and validate information through multiple searches.
- Research Execution Flow: Follow a structured process of understanding the current state, performing searches, analyzing results, and synthesizing findings into a final report.
Next Steps:
You are encouraged to begin executing the research by analyzing the performance metrics and integration challenges of RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka, ensuring at least three rounds of research for quality insights. The findings will be documented in a detailed markdown report once the exploration is complete. Maintain curiosity and continue to verify facts throughout the research process.