mineable-coins

mineable-coins

3.9

mineable-coins is hosted online, so all tools can be tested directly either in theInspector tabor in theOnline Client.

If you are the rightful owner of mineable-coins and would like to certify it and/or have it hosted online, please leave a comment on the right or send an email to henry@mcphub.com.

Mineable Coins MCP Server provides real-time, detailed data on a wide array of mineable cryptocurrencies.

Test Report

  • Build Successful
  • Server Started
  • Client Connected
  • Tools Listed
  • All Tools Succeeded
  • Any Tool Succeeded
ToolTotal TestsSuccessFailSuccess Rate
get_coins_data110100%

Evaluation
Total Score: 6/10

The agent demonstrates a strong ability to provide detailed and accurate information on specific topics, such as mineable cryptocurrencies and consensus algorithms, as well as challenges in the electric vehicle market. These responses are well-structured, clear, and align with the agent's claimed capabilities. However, the agent struggles with real-time information retrieval, as evidenced by its inability to provide updates on recent developments in quantum computing and AI. This limitation significantly impacts its usefulness for queries requiring up-to-date information. The agent's transparency in acknowledging its limitations is a positive aspect, but it needs to improve its search functionality and error handling to better meet user expectations. Suggestions for improvement include implementing real-time search capabilities, providing alternative resources when direct answers are unavailable, and enhancing responses with recent data and regional insights.

  • Test case 1
    Score: 9/10
    What are the top 5 mineable cryptocurrencies as of 2025, and can you provide some details about their consensus algorithms?

    Here are the top 5 mineable cryptocurrencies as of 2025, along with details about their consensus algorithms:

    1. Bitcoin (BTC)

      • Algorithm: SHA-256
      • Description: Bitcoin uses the SHA-256 hashing algorithm for its proof-of-work consensus mechanism. Miners compete to solve complex mathematical problems, and the first to solve it gets to add a new block to the blockchain and receives a reward.

    2. Ethereum Classic (ETC)

      • Algorithm: Etchash
      • Description: Ethereum Classic employs the Etchash algorithm, a modification of Ethash, which is designed to be ASIC resistant. This allows for more decentralized mining using consumer-grade hardware.

    3. Litecoin (LTC)

      • Algorithm: Scrypt
      • Description: Litecoin uses the Scrypt algorithm for its proof-of-work consensus. This algorithm was designed to be more memory-intensive, making it harder for ASICs to dominate mining, although ASICs have since been developed for Scrypt as well.

    4. Dogecoin (DOGE)

      • Algorithm: Scrypt
      • Description: Similar to Litecoin, Dogecoin also utilizes the Scrypt algorithm. Initially created as a joke, it has gained a significant following and is often used for tipping and charitable donations.

    5. Ravencoin (RVN)

      • Algorithm: KawPow
      • Description: Ravencoin utilizes the KawPow algorithm, which is designed to be ASIC resistant and promotes decentralized mining. It focuses on the creation and transfer of assets on its blockchain.

    These cryptocurrencies utilize different consensus algorithms, each with its unique characteristics and implications for mining and network security. If you need more information about any specific coin or algorithm, feel free to ask!

  • Test case 2
    Score: 1/10
    Can you provide a summary of the latest developments in quantum computing research as of now, including any breakthroughs or notable advancements?

    Failed to get an answer.

  • Test case 3
    Score: 8/10
    What are the key differences between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work consensus algorithms, and how do these differences impact energy consumption and network security?

    Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Proof-of-Work (PoW) are two different consensus algorithms used in blockchain networks to validate transactions and secure the network. Here are the key differences between them and their impacts on energy consumption and network security:

    Proof-of-Work (PoW)

    1. Mechanism:

      • PoW requires miners to solve complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and create new blocks. The first miner to solve the puzzle gets to add the block to the blockchain and is rewarded with cryptocurrency.

    2. Energy Consumption:

      • PoW is energy-intensive because it requires significant computational power to solve the puzzles. This leads to high electricity consumption, as seen in networks like Bitcoin.

    3. Network Security:

      • PoW is considered secure because the computational power required to attack the network (e.g., a 51% attack) is immense. An attacker would need to control more than half of the network's mining power, which is costly and difficult to achieve.

    Proof-of-Stake (PoS)

    1. Mechanism:

      • PoS selects validators based on the number of coins they hold and are willing to "stake" as collateral. Validators are chosen to create new blocks and validate transactions based on their stake and sometimes other factors like the age of the stake.

    2. Energy Consumption:

      • PoS is much more energy-efficient than PoW because it doesn't require solving energy-intensive puzzles. The process of selecting validators is computationally simple and doesn't require significant electricity.

    3. Network Security:

      • PoS is secure but in a different way. It relies on economic incentives to deter malicious behavior. Validators have a financial stake in the network, and if they act dishonestly, they risk losing their staked coins. However, some argue that PoS could be more vulnerable to certain types of attacks, like long-range attacks, though these can be mitigated with additional protocols.

    Impact on Energy Consumption and Network Security

    • Energy Consumption: PoS is significantly more energy-efficient than PoW, making it more environmentally friendly and sustainable in the long term.

    • Network Security: Both PoW and PoS have their strengths and weaknesses in terms of security. PoW's security is based on computational power, while PoS relies on economic incentives and the distribution of stakes. The choice between them often depends on the specific needs and goals of the blockchain network.

    In summary, PoW is more energy-intensive but traditionally considered very secure due to its reliance on computational power. PoS offers a more energy-efficient alternative with security based on economic incentives and the distribution of stakes.

  • Test case 4
    Score: 1/10
    Can you provide a list of the most significant scientific discoveries in the field of artificial intelligence over the past two years, and explain their potential impact on technology and society?

    Failed to get an answer.

  • Test case 5
    Score: 9/10
    What are the current challenges facing the global electric vehicle market, and how might these challenges be addressed in the next two years?

    The global electric vehicle (EV) market is facing several challenges that could significantly impact its growth over the next two years. Here are some of the key challenges and potential ways to address them:

    Challenges Facing the Global EV Market

    1. Supply Chain Disruptions: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in supply chains, affecting the availability of key components such as semiconductors. This issue continues to affect EV production and delivery times.

    2. Battery Production and Raw Material Supply: There is a growing demand for batteries, and the supply of critical raw materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel is under pressure. This can lead to increased costs and potential shortages.

    3. Infrastructure Development: Insufficient charging infrastructure remains a significant barrier to EV adoption. Many consumers are hesitant to switch to electric vehicles due to concerns about charging availability and convenience.

    4. Consumer Awareness and Acceptance: While awareness of EVs is growing, many consumers still have misconceptions about their range, performance, and charging times compared to traditional vehicles.

    5. Regulatory and Policy Challenges: Different countries have varying regulations regarding emissions, incentives for EVs, and fuel standards, which can complicate market entry and expansion for manufacturers.

    6. Competition from Other Technologies: The EV market faces competition from alternative fuel vehicles, such as hydrogen fuel cells and biofuels, which might appeal to some consumers seeking green alternatives.

    Potential Solutions and Strategies

    1. Strengthening Supply Chains: Manufacturers can diversify their supply chains and work with multiple suppliers to mitigate risks associated with shortages and disruptions. Investments in local production facilities may also help.

    2. Investing in Battery Recycling and New Technologies: Developing recycling technologies for EV batteries can help manage raw material supply issues. Additionally, research into alternative battery technologies could reduce dependency on scarce materials.

    3. Expanding Charging Infrastructure: Governments and private companies should invest in expanding charging networks, including fast chargers, to make transitioning to EVs more convenient for consumers.

    4. Enhancing Consumer Education: Marketing campaigns aimed at educating consumers about the benefits of EVs, including cost savings, environmental impact, and advances in technology, can help improve acceptance and demand.

    5. Advocating for Supportive Policies: Collaboration between the automotive industry and governments to create favorable policies and incentives for EV adoption can drive growth. This includes tax rebates, grants for infrastructure development, and subsidies for consumers.

    6. Innovative Business Models: Automakers could explore alternative business models, such as subscription services or car-sharing programs, to provide consumers with flexible options and reduce the barrier of upfront costs.

    By addressing these challenges proactively, the electric vehicle market can continue to grow and evolve, paving the way for a more sustainable future in transportation.