90cigars/idwo-mcp-agent
If you are the rightful owner of idwo-mcp-agent and would like to certify it and/or have it hosted online, please leave a comment on the right or send an email to dayong@mcphub.com.
The Intelligent Development Workflow Orchestrator (IDWO) is an advanced MCP Server Agent designed to automate complex developer workflows by orchestrating actions across platforms like GitHub, JIRA, and Slack using AI-powered decision-making.
Intelligent Development Workflow Orchestrator (IDWO)
An advanced MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server Agent that automates complex developer workflows by intelligently orchestrating actions across GitHub, JIRA, and Slack using AI-powered decision making.
🎯 Overview
IDWO bridges the gap between different development tools by providing intelligent automation that understands context, makes decisions, and executes multi-step workflows across platforms. Unlike simple webhook-based automations, IDWO uses LLM-powered analysis to provide contextual, adaptive workflow management.
Key Capabilities
- 🧠 AI-Powered Analysis: Uses GPT-4 to analyze pull requests, triage issues, and assess release readiness
- 🔄 Cross-Platform Orchestration: Seamlessly coordinates actions across GitHub, JIRA, and Slack
- 📊 Intelligent Insights: Generates team productivity metrics and identifies workflow bottlenecks
- 🎛️ MCP Integration: Works with ChatGPT, Claude, GitHub Copilot, and any MCP-compatible interface
- ⚡ Real-Time Workflow Sync: Maintains consistent state across all integrated platforms
🏗️ Architecture
graph TB
A[MCP Client] --> B[IDWO MCP Server]
B --> C[OpenAI Agent]
B --> D[GitHub Integration]
B --> E[JIRA Integration]
B --> F[Slack Integration]
B --> G[Workflow Orchestrator]
C --> H[GPT-4 Analysis]
D --> I[GitHub API]
E --> J[JIRA REST API]
F --> K[Slack Web API]
G --> L[State Management]
Core Components
- MCP Server: Exposes tools and handles client requests
- Service Integrations: GitHub, JIRA, and Slack API clients with error handling
- AI Agent: OpenAI integration for intelligent decision making
- Workflow Orchestrator: Coordinates multi-step operations across services
- State Management: Tracks workflow status and maintains consistency
🚀 Quick Start
Prerequisites
- Node.js 22+
- Docker and Docker Compose (optional)
- API keys for OpenAI, GitHub, JIRA, and Slack
Installation
-
Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/your-org/idwo-mcp-server.git cd idwo-mcp-server -
Install dependencies
npm install -
Configure environment
cp .env.example .env # Edit .env with your API keys and configuration -
Build and start
npm run build npm start
Docker Quick Start
# Start with all dependencies
docker-compose up -d
# Production deployment
docker-compose -f docker-compose.prod.yml up -d
🔧 Configuration
Environment Variables
Required API Keys
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-your-openai-api-key-here
GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_your-github-token-here
JIRA_URL=https://your-domain.atlassian.net
JIRA_USERNAME=your-email@company.com
JIRA_API_TOKEN=your-jira-api-token
SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=xoxb-your-slack-bot-token
Optional Configuration
# Database & Cache
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://user:password@localhost:5432/idwo
REDIS_URL=redis://localhost:6379
# Security
JWT_SECRET=your-jwt-secret-key
ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-character-encryption-key
# Performance
RATE_LIMIT_MAX_REQUESTS=100
CIRCUIT_BREAKER_TIMEOUT=5000
Service Setup
GitHub
- Create a Personal Access Token with
repo,read:org, andread:userpermissions - Set
GITHUB_TOKENin environment variables
JIRA
- Create an API token in Atlassian Account Settings
- Configure
JIRA_URL,JIRA_USERNAME, andJIRA_API_TOKEN
Slack
- Create a Slack App with appropriate scopes (
chat:write,channels:read,users:read) - Install the app to your workspace and obtain bot token
- Set
SLACK_BOT_TOKENand other Slack configuration
OpenAI
- Obtain an API key from OpenAI platform
- Set
OPENAI_API_KEYand optionallyOPENAI_MODEL
📖 MCP Tools Reference
analyze_pr
Analyzes pull requests with AI-powered insights.
{
"owner": "string",
"repo": "string",
"pull_number": 123,
"include_jira_context": true
}
Response: Risk assessment, suggested reviewers, estimated review time, related JIRA tickets
smart_triage
Automatically categorizes and prioritizes issues.
{
"issue_key": "PROJ-123",
"github_issue_url": "https://github.com/org/repo/issues/456",
"team_context": "backend-team"
}
Response: Priority, category, effort estimate, suggested assignee and sprint
orchestrate_release
Coordinates releases across multiple platforms.
{
"release_version": "v2.1.0",
"repository": "org/repo",
"jira_project": "PROJ",
"slack_channel": "#releases",
"dry_run": false
}
Response: Readiness score, blockers, test coverage, recommendations
sync_workflow_status
Synchronizes status updates across platforms.
{
"workflow_id": "pr-org-repo-123",
"status_update": "in-review",
"platforms": ["github", "jira", "slack"]
}
get_team_insights
Generates productivity analytics and identifies bottlenecks.
{
"team_name": "backend-team",
"time_period": "30d",
"include_predictions": true
}
Response: Velocity trends, bottlenecks, metrics, predictions
🧪 Testing
Unit Tests
npm run test
npm run test:watch
Integration Tests
npm run test:integration
Coverage Reports
npm run test -- --coverage
Test Structure
- Unit tests: Individual component functionality
- Integration tests: End-to-end workflow validation
- Mock services: External API simulation
- Error scenarios: Failure mode testing
🚢 Deployment
Local Development
npm run dev # Development with hot reload
Docker Deployment
# Build production image
docker build -t idwo-mcp-server .
# Run with docker-compose
docker-compose up -d
Kubernetes Deployment
# Apply manifests
kubectl apply -f deployment/k8s/
# Or using Helm
helm install idwo deployment/helm/idwo-chart/ \
--set secrets.openai.apiKey=$OPENAI_API_KEY \
--set secrets.github.token=$GITHUB_TOKEN
Production Considerations
- Use managed databases (RDS, Redis ElastiCache)
- Configure proper secrets management (Kubernetes secrets, HashiCorp Vault)
- Set up monitoring and alerting (Prometheus, Grafana)
- Implement proper logging aggregation (ELK stack)
- Configure load balancers and ingress controllers
🔒 Security Considerations
Current Security Measures
- Authentication: OAuth 2.0 for all service integrations
- Encryption: Sensitive data encrypted at rest and in transit
- Rate Limiting: Request throttling to prevent abuse
- Input Validation: Zod schemas for all inputs
- Network Security: Docker network isolation, Kubernetes network policies
- Container Security: Non-root user, read-only filesystem, minimal attack surface
Potential Security Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| API Key Exposure | High | Encrypted secret storage, rotation policies |
| Prompt Injection | Medium | Input sanitization, output validation |
| Service Account Compromise | High | Least privilege access, regular key rotation |
| Data Exfiltration | High | Network segmentation, audit logging |
| DoS Attacks | Medium | Rate limiting, circuit breakers |
Security Best Practices
- Secret Management: Use external secret stores (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager)
- Access Control: Implement RBAC for different user roles
- Audit Logging: Log all API calls and workflow executions
- Network Security: Use VPCs, security groups, and network policies
- Regular Updates: Keep dependencies updated and scan for vulnerabilities
⚡ Performance & Scalability
Current Performance Characteristics
- Response Time: Sub-second for simple operations, 2-5s for AI analysis
- Throughput: 100+ requests/minute per instance
- Concurrency: Async/await throughout, connection pooling
- Memory Usage: ~512MB baseline, 2GB under load
- CPU Usage: 0.1-0.5 CPU cores typical, 1+ during AI inference
Scaling Strategies
Horizontal Scaling
- Kubernetes HPA: CPU/memory-based autoscaling (2-10 pods)
- Load Balancing: Round-robin across healthy instances
- Stateless Design: No local state dependencies
Performance Optimizations
- Connection Pooling: Persistent HTTP connections to APIs
- Caching: Redis for API responses and computed results
- Circuit Breakers: Fail-fast for unhealthy services
- Batching: Group operations where possible
Bottleneck Analysis
| Component | Bottleneck | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI API | Rate limits, latency | Request queuing, response caching |
| GitHub API | Rate limits | Smart pagination, caching |
| JIRA API | Slow responses | Connection pooling, timeouts |
| Database | Query performance | Indexing, read replicas |
Monitoring Metrics
- Request latency percentiles (p50, p95, p99)
- Error rates by service and operation
- API rate limit utilization
- Database connection pool usage
- Memory and CPU utilization
🐛 Failure Scenarios & Testing
Common Failure Modes
API Service Failures
- GitHub API Outage: Circuit breaker prevents cascade failures
- JIRA Rate Limiting: Request queuing and backoff strategies
- Slack Service Degradation: Graceful degradation with logging
- OpenAI Timeouts: Retry logic with exponential backoff
Infrastructure Failures
- Database Connectivity: Connection pooling with automatic reconnection
- Redis Cache Miss: Fallback to direct API calls
- Network Partitions: Service mesh resilience patterns
- Pod Failures: Kubernetes automatic restart and scaling
Testing Strategies
Chaos Engineering
# Simulate service failures
kubectl patch deployment idwo-server -p '{"spec":{"template":{"spec":{"containers":[{"name":"idwo-server","env":[{"name":"GITHUB_TOKEN","value":"invalid"}]}]}}}}'
# Network partitioning
kubectl apply -f tests/chaos/network-partition.yaml
# Resource constraints
kubectl apply -f tests/chaos/memory-pressure.yaml
Load Testing
# Install k6 and run load tests
k6 run tests/load/pr-analysis.js
k6 run tests/load/workflow-orchestration.js
Integration Test Scenarios
- API authentication failures
- Malformed API responses
- Timeout and retry logic
- Rate limit handling
- Data consistency checks
Recovery Procedures
- Service Recovery: Automatic restart via health checks
- Data Recovery: Point-in-time database restoration
- State Reconciliation: Workflow state validation and repair
- Monitoring: Automated alerting and incident response
📈 Monitoring & Observability
Metrics Collection
- Application Metrics: Request rates, response times, error counts
- Business Metrics: Workflow completion rates, AI accuracy
- Infrastructure Metrics: CPU, memory, network, disk usage
- Custom Metrics: API quota usage, cache hit rates
Logging Strategy
- Structured Logging: JSON format with correlation IDs
- Log Levels: Error, warn, info, debug with appropriate filtering
- Centralized Collection: ELK stack or cloud logging services
- Log Retention: 30 days for debug, 1 year for audit logs
Alerting Rules
- High error rates (>5% for 5 minutes)
- Response time degradation (p95 > 10s)
- API rate limit consumption (>80%)
- Failed workflow orchestrations
- Infrastructure resource exhaustion
Dashboards
- Operations Dashboard: System health, request metrics, error rates
- Business Dashboard: Workflow completion, user adoption, ROI metrics
- Performance Dashboard: Response times, throughput, resource utilization
🔮 Future Roadmap
Near-term Improvements (3-6 months)
Multi-tenant Architecture
- Organization Isolation: Separate data and configurations per tenant
- RBAC Implementation: Role-based access control within organizations
- Billing Integration: Usage tracking and cost allocation
Enhanced Analytics
- Predictive Analytics: ML models for sprint planning and risk assessment
- Anomaly Detection: Unusual patterns in team behavior or system performance
- Custom Metrics: User-defined KPIs and dashboard customization
Medium-term Expansion (6-12 months)
Additional Integrations
- Linear: Issue tracking for modern development teams
- Notion: Documentation and knowledge management
- PagerDuty: Incident management and alerting
- Discord: Team communication and notifications
Advanced AI Capabilities
- Custom Model Fine-tuning: Organization-specific AI models
- Multi-modal Analysis: Code, documentation, and visual content
- Automated Code Review: AI-powered code quality assessment
Workflow Builder
- Visual Editor: Drag-and-drop workflow creation
- Template Library: Pre-built automation patterns
- Custom Actions: User-defined workflow steps
Long-term Vision (12+ months)
Multi-cloud Deployment
- Cloud Agnostic: AWS, GCP, Azure deployment options
- Edge Computing: Regional deployments for low latency
- Hybrid Cloud: On-premises and cloud hybrid architectures
Advanced Analytics Platform
- Data Lake Integration: Historical data analysis and reporting
- Real-time Streaming: Live workflow monitoring and alerts
- ML Pipeline: Automated model training and deployment
Platform Ecosystem
- Plugin Architecture: Third-party integrations and extensions
- API Marketplace: Community-contributed workflow templates
- Developer SDK: Tools for building custom integrations
📚 Architecture Decisions & Tradeoffs
Technology Stack Decisions
TypeScript vs Python
Chosen: TypeScript
- ✅ Pros: Superior async handling, shared frontend/backend code, better MCP ecosystem
- ❌ Cons: Smaller ML ecosystem, more complex build process
- Alternative: Python with FastMCP for data-heavy workflows
Direct API Integration vs Webhook Architecture
Chosen: Direct API Integration with Circuit Breakers
- ✅ Pros: Real-time data, fine-grained control, easier testing
- ❌ Cons: Higher API consumption, potential polling overhead
- Alternative: Event-driven webhooks for high-volume scenarios
Monolithic vs Microservices
Chosen: Modular Monolith
- ✅ Pros: Simpler deployment, shared types, easier debugging
- ❌ Cons: Scaling limitations, technology coupling
- Future: Microservices transition as teams and complexity grow
Infrastructure Decisions
Kubernetes vs Serverless
Chosen: Kubernetes with Serverless Options
- ✅ Pros: Better resource utilization, service mesh benefits, vendor neutrality
- ❌ Cons: Operational complexity, higher infrastructure costs
- Alternative: AWS Lambda for cost-sensitive, low-volume deployments
PostgreSQL + Redis vs NoSQL
Chosen: PostgreSQL + Redis Hybrid
- ✅ Pros: ACID compliance, mature tooling, flexible querying
- ❌ Cons: Operational overhead vs managed services
- Alternative: DynamoDB + ElastiCache for cloud-native architectures
AI Integration Decisions
OpenAI API vs Self-hosted Models
Chosen: OpenAI API with Self-hosted Fallback
- ✅ Pros: Latest models, reliability, comprehensive capabilities
- ❌ Cons: Vendor lock-in, cost at scale, data privacy concerns
- Alternative: Ollama for sensitive data or cost optimization
🤝 Contributing
Development Setup
- Fork the repository
- Create a feature branch:
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature - Install dependencies:
npm install - Run tests:
npm test - Submit a pull request
Code Standards
- TypeScript: Strict mode enabled
- ESLint: Enforced code style
- Prettier: Automatic formatting
- Jest: Comprehensive test coverage (>90%)
- Conventional Commits: Semantic commit messages
Pull Request Process
- Ensure all tests pass
- Update documentation as needed
- Add tests for new functionality
- Request review from maintainers
- Address feedback and merge
📄 License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the file for details.
🙏 Acknowledgments
- Model Context Protocol for the foundational MCP specification
- OpenAI for GPT-4 and AI capabilities
- Anthropic for Claude and MCP development tools
- Open source contributors and the developer community
📞 Support
- Issues: GitHub Issues
- Discussions: GitHub Discussions
- Documentation: Wiki
- Email: team@your-org.com
Built with ❤️ for the developer community